The Law Surrounding Sharing Intimate Images & ‘Revenge Porn’

Picture of James Janke

James Janke

Founder & Director

Updated On:
Sharing Intimate Images

One in ten Australian adults has experienced their intimate image/s being shared without consent, with mainstream social media used as the predominant channel for distribution.

In NSW, there are laws in place to prohibit sharing intimate images, or ‘revenge porn’, and these offences attract significant penalties.

Key Takeways

Table of Contents

What is considered an intimate image?

As defined by section 91N of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), an ‘intimate image’ is an image of a person’s private parts, or of a person engaged in a private act, in circumstances in which a reasonable person would reasonably expect to be afforded privacy.

This can also be an image that has been altered to appear to show a person’s private parts, or a person engaged in a private act, in circumstances in which a reasonable person would reasonably expect to be afforded privacy.

Private parts’  means a person’s genital area or anal area, whether bare or covered by underwear, or the breasts of a female person, or transgender or intersex person identifying as female, whether or not the breasts are sexually developed.

Circumstances relating to “engaged in a private act” include:

  • In a state of undress;
  • Using the toilet, showering or bathing;
  • Engaged in a sexual act of a kind not ordinarily done in public; or
  • Engaged in any other like activity.

Offences Relating to Sharing Intimate Images

Record intimate images without consent

Under section 91P of the Crimes Act, it is an offence to record, take or capture an image by any means, of an intimate image of another person. For this offence to be proven, it must be shown that a person intentionally made the recording without the consent of another person and knowing the person did not consent to the recording or being reckless as to whether the person consented to the recording.

The maximum penalty for this is a fine of $11,000 or imprisonment for 3 years or both.

Distribute intimate images without consent

Under section 91Q of the Crimes Act, it is an offence to intentionally distribute an intimate image of another person.

It must be shown that the person, without the consent of the other person and knowing the person did not consent to the distribution or being reckless as to whether the person consented to the distribution,

The maximum penalty for this is a fine of $11,000 or imprisonment for 3 years or both.

Threaten to record or distribute an intimate image

According to section 91R of the Crimes Act, it is an offence to threaten to record or distribute an intimate image of another person.

The maximum penalty for this is a fine of $11,000 or imprisonment for 3 years or both.

The threat can be made by any conduct and may be explicit or implicit and conditional or unconditional. A threat to distribute an image can be made out, irrespective of whether or not the image exists.

The maximum penalty for this is a fine of $11,000 or imprisonment for 3 years or both.

Rectification following contravention of section 91P or 91Q

Under section 91S, if a person is found guilty of an offence against section 91P or 91Q, the court may order the person to take reasonable actions to remove, retract, recover, delete or destroy any intimate image recorded or distributed by the person in contravention of the section within a period specified by the court.

If without reasonable excuse, you contravene this order, you will be guilty of an offence which carries a maximum penalty of $5,500 fine or imprisonment for 2 years, or both.

Exceptions to the offences relating to the intimate image

Section 91T specifies that an offence recording or distributing intimate images does not arise if:

  • The conduct alleged to constitute the offence was done for a genuine medical or scientific purpose; or
  • The conduct alleged to constitute the offence was done by a law enforcement officer for a genuine law enforcement purpose; or
  • the conduct alleged to constitute the offence was required by a court or otherwise reasonably necessary to be done for legal proceedings; or
  • A reasonable person would consider the conduct of the accused person acceptable, having regard to each of the following (to the extent relevant)—
    • the nature and content of the image;
    • the circumstances in which the image was recorded or distributed;
    • the age, intellectual capacity, vulnerability or other relevant circumstances of the person depicted in the image;
    • the degree to which the accused person’s actions affect the privacy of the person depicted in the image;
    • The relationship between the accused person and the person depicted in the image.

Need an Experienced Criminal Lawyer?

If you or someone you know needs legal advice or representation for a criminal law matter, contact Hamilton Janke Lawyers.

Get Legal Advice

Speak to our criminal and traffic lawyers now for expert legal advice and representation.

Table of Contents

Get Legal Advice

Speak to our criminal and traffic lawyers now for expert legal advice and representation.

Featured articles

Apprehended violence orders (AVOs) constitute the primary means in NSW of asserting the fundamental right to freedom from fear. AVOs

Modern slavery is a serious violation of an individual’s dignity and human rights. Exploitative practices including human trafficking, slavery, servitude,

One in ten Australian adults has experienced their intimate image/s being shared without consent, with mainstream social media used as

The landscape of domestic violence legislation in New South Wales underwent a significant transformation with the introduction of the Bail

An Apprehended Domestic Violence Order (ADVO) can have dramatic ramifications, whether you are the person seeking protection or the person