Sexual Assault Trial Sparks Legislation Review

Road-Rule-Reforms+copy+3

Want more articles like this?

Join our newsletter. No spam, unsubscribe at any time.
news

A sexual assault case has been put on hold while the NSW Government decides whether to amend legislation that renders evidence about fabricated sexual assault allegations inadmissible.

The case has been halted while NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman is briefed on the matter.

Admissibility of evidence relating to sexual experience

The legislation in question is section 293 of the Criminal Procedure Act (NSW) (the Act).

The law regulates the nature of evidence that can be adduced in cases where a defendant is charged with a prescribed sexual offence. Prescribed sexual offences are defined in section 3 of the Act; they include:

  • Sexual assault (s 61I)
  • Assault with intent to have sexual intercourse (s 61K)
  • Sexual touching (s 61KC)

Section 293 outlines that evidence which relates to the sexual reputation of a complainant is inadmissible.

It further states that evidence which discloses (or implies) that the complainant has, or may have had, sexual experience or a lack of sexual experience is inadmissible. Evidence relating to previous ‘sexual activities’ is also excluded.

The RB case

The legislation was introduced to ensure that complainants could not be cross-examined about their sexual history. However, there are concerns that the section may have been drafted too broadly, and may lead to “significant unfairness”.

The criticism has come to light following the decision in what is known as the “RB” case. RB, the defendant, was facing sexual assault charges. RB’s defence team had uncovered evidence of 12 occasions where the alleged victim has made fake allegations of sexual abuse. The complainant had previously been charged with (and pleaded guilty to) making a false report to the police.

However, RB was prevented from bringing this evidence before the Court, as the Court ruled that the evidence fell under the section 293 umbrella and was therefore inadmissible.

Where to now?

Mr Speakman has announced that the Department of Communities and Justice will have a brief prepared by the end of the month.

Once the brief is prepared, it will be up to Parliament to take action to reform the legislation. 

If you need advice or representation for a criminal matter, contact the team at Hamilton Janke Lawyers 24/7 on 4038 1666.

Share this post

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on google
Google+
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest

Hamilton Janke Lawyers

Hamilton Janke Lawyers is a criminal defence law firm in Newcastle, NSW. We service courts throughout NSW. Newcastle, Sydney, Central Coast and more. We have extensive litigation experience in defending criminal and traffic matters, AVOs, bail applications, appeals, inquests commissions and inquiries. Looking for a lawyer who will defend your interests? Fierce, dedicated legal representation - when you need it most. 24/7 assistance

Recent Articles

R U OK Day 2019

Today is National R U OK Day. It is an opportunity for us to reflect on the importance of checking in with family, friends and

Read More »

Need Help?

Submit An Online Enquiry.
Most people receive a response within 24 hours.

Do you know your rights when pulled over by police?

We answer questions like this in our Newsletter. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.